Skip to main content
Regulatory Council
green gradient background, "The Future of Application Security Is Already Here." and a read the report button.
Category: Risk Assessment & Analysis

Emerging Risk Identification

Also known as: Horizon Scanning, Emerging Risk Analysis
Simply put

Emerging risk identification is the process of spotting new or developing threats before they fully materialize, so an organization can prepare or respond in time. Emerging risks are typically new or future risks whose potential to cause harm is not yet well understood and whose effects are difficult to assess. Identifying them early can create opportunities to take mitigating action and reduce the chance that a risk grows into a significant problem.

Formal definition

Emerging risk identification refers to the structured processes and analytical practices used to detect risks arising from newly identified hazards to which significant exposure may occur, or from unexpected new or evolving conditions, before those risks are fully characterized or quantified. Because the hazard potential and implications of emerging risks are often not yet reliably known, identification typically depends on the analyst's understanding of the organization, its business, processes, and products, combined with structured approaches such as horizon scanning to surface risks on the horizon. Timely identification is intended to enable proactive risk mitigation and treatment before a risk develops into a material event; it does not itself assess, quantify, or treat the risk, which are distinct downstream activities. The specific meaning, scope, and methods vary by sector, framework, and jurisdiction, and definitions of what constitutes an 'emerging' risk are context-dependent.

Why it matters

Emerging risks are, by definition, those whose hazard potential is not yet reliably known and whose implications are difficult to assess. This uncertainty is precisely what makes early identification valuable: an organization that spots a developing threat before it fully materializes gains time to prepare, respond, or take mitigating action, rather than reacting after the risk has grown into a material event. Waiting until a risk is well understood often means waiting until it has already begun to cause harm.

The practical stakes are that timely identification creates the opportunity to execute necessary risk mitigation actions and thereby reduce the chance that a nascent risk evolves into a significant problem. Because emerging risks frequently arise from newly identified hazards to which significant exposure may occur, or from unexpected new or evolving conditions, they can fall outside the coverage of existing risk registers and controls that were designed around known and quantified threats. A structured effort to surface risks on the horizon helps close that gap.

It is important to be clear about the limits of this activity. Emerging risk identification does not itself assess, quantify, or treat the risk; those are distinct downstream activities. Its purpose is to bring a developing threat into view early enough for the organization to decide what, if anything, to do about it. What counts as 'emerging' is context-dependent and varies by sector, framework, and jurisdiction, so organizations should calibrate their approach to their own business, processes, and products.

Who it's relevant to

Risk Managers and ERM Functions
Risk managers use emerging risk identification to extend their coverage beyond known and quantified threats to risks that are still developing. A structured approach helps them surface risks on the horizon and route them into assessment and treatment processes before those risks evolve into material events.
Risk Analysts and Assessors
Analysts and assessors carry much of the practical burden, since identifying emerging risks depends on knowing the organization's business, processes, and products well enough to sense new or evolving threats whose hazard potential is not yet reliably known. Their judgment complements structured tools such as horizon scanning.
Boards and Senior Leadership
Boards and executives rely on emerging risk identification to inform strategic decisions and oversight, gaining early visibility into threats that could affect objectives. Because these risks are difficult to assess, leadership should understand that identification signals a potential concern rather than a fully quantified exposure.
Sector Regulators and Specialized Bodies
In some sectors, dedicated bodies treat emerging risk identification as a core function, for example, the European Food Safety Authority defines an emerging risk as one resulting from a newly identified hazard to which significant exposure may occur, or from an unexpected new or evolving condition. Definitions and scope are context-dependent and vary by sector and jurisdiction.

Inside Emerging Risk Identification

Horizon Scanning
A structured process of systematically monitoring the internal and external environment for early signals of new or evolving threats and opportunities that may affect objectives. It typically extends beyond the organization's current risk register to areas of uncertainty that are not yet well understood or quantified.
Weak Signals and Trend Analysis
The identification and interpretation of early, often ambiguous indicators, such as technological shifts, regulatory developments, geopolitical events, or social changes, that could develop into material risks over time. These signals are frequently characterized by high uncertainty and limited historical data.
Uncertainty Characterization
The acknowledgment that emerging risks often lack sufficient data for conventional likelihood and impact estimation. Practitioners typically describe such risks qualitatively, by plausibility, velocity, and potential interconnectedness, rather than relying solely on quantified probability metrics.
Scenario and Foresight Techniques
Forward-looking methods such as scenario analysis, war-gaming, and structured expert elicitation used to explore how uncertain developments might unfold and interact. These techniques support exploration of plausible futures rather than prediction of a single outcome.
Cross-Functional Input
The gathering of diverse perspectives from across business units, risk, compliance, legal, and external sources to counter blind spots. Emerging risks frequently span multiple domains and can fall outside any single function's field of view.
Governance and Escalation Linkage
The connection between identified emerging risks and the organization's governance structures, so that novel threats can be reviewed, prioritized, and escalated to appropriate decision-makers. This links the identification activity to the broader risk management and oversight processes.

Common questions

Answers to the questions practitioners most commonly ask about Emerging Risk Identification.

Is emerging risk identification the same as forecasting or predicting future events?
No. Emerging risk identification is not a prediction exercise that forecasts specific events with defined probabilities. It is typically an exploratory, forward-looking process focused on detecting novel, evolving, or poorly understood threats and opportunities whose likelihood, impact, or timing may not yet be quantifiable. Because emerging risks often lack reliable historical data, many frameworks treat them qualitatively, using signals, scenarios, and horizon scanning, rather than through the statistical modeling associated with established, well-characterized risks. The aim is generally to surface uncertainty early enough to inform monitoring and preparedness, not to assert what will happen.
Once an emerging risk is identified, does that mean a control has been put in place to address it?
Not necessarily. Identification and control are distinct activities. Identifying an emerging risk means recognizing a potential event and its possible effect on objectives; it does not by itself modify that risk. A control is a separate measure taken to change the likelihood or impact of a risk. In many programs, newly identified emerging risks are first placed under monitoring or further assessment precisely because they are not yet well understood, and treatment decisions, including whether and how to control them, follow later. Treating identification as if it were mitigation can create a false sense of preparedness.
How can emerging risk identification be integrated into an existing risk management process?
In many frameworks, emerging risk identification is positioned as an input that feeds the broader risk identification and assessment cycle rather than as a wholly separate activity. Organizations often connect horizon-scanning or environmental-scanning outputs to their existing risk register, escalation pathways, and governance reporting so that newly surfaced items can be triaged, assigned ownership, and revisited over time. Because emerging risks may not fit standard scoring criteria, some organizations use a provisional or watchlist category. The specific mechanics vary by organization size, sector, and the framework in use, so integration should be tailored to existing structures.
Who should be responsible for identifying emerging risks?
Responsibility is often distributed rather than assigned to a single function. Because emerging risks can arise from technological, regulatory, environmental, geopolitical, or market developments, useful signals may come from many parts of an organization as well as external sources. Governance arrangements typically clarify decision rights, who collects signals, who evaluates them, and who decides on escalation or response. In some organizations a risk or strategy function coordinates the process while business units and subject-matter experts contribute domain insight. The appropriate allocation depends on the organization's structure and governance model, and defining ownership is generally regarded as a leading practice rather than a universal legal requirement.
What sources or methods are commonly used to detect emerging risks?
Commonly cited approaches include horizon scanning, environmental or PESTLE-style scanning, scenario analysis, expert elicitation, and structured review of internal and external signals such as regulatory developments, industry trends, incident patterns, and stakeholder concerns. These methods are typically qualitative and iterative, reflecting the limited historical data available for novel risks. The suitability of any given method varies by context, and organizations often combine several to reduce blind spots. No single method should be treated as comprehensive, and the choice of techniques should be verified against the organization's objectives and any applicable framework guidance.
How often should emerging risk identification be performed?
There is no universally mandated frequency; the appropriate cadence typically depends on the volatility of the organization's operating environment, its risk profile, and its governance expectations. Because emerging risks by nature evolve, many organizations treat identification as an ongoing or periodic activity rather than a one-time exercise, sometimes combining continuous signal monitoring with scheduled reviews tied to strategic planning or risk reporting cycles. Some sectors or regulators may set expectations around review frequency, so applicable requirements should be confirmed against the relevant jurisdiction, sector guidance, and internal policy.

Common misconceptions

Emerging risk identification is simply about predicting the future or naming 'black swan' events in advance.
It is generally a process of improving preparedness under uncertainty, not accurate prediction. Many frameworks emphasize sensitivity to weak signals and readiness to respond, rather than forecasting specific events with confidence. Some emerging risks may remain difficult to foresee regardless of the process quality.
An identified emerging risk can be treated the same way as an established risk in the register, with the same likelihood and impact scoring.
Emerging risks are typically characterized by limited data and high uncertainty, so standard quantitative scoring may be unreliable or misleading. Practitioners often apply qualitative or scenario-based approaches, and note that identifying an emerging risk is distinct from having controls in place to modify it.
Emerging risk identification is a one-time or periodic exercise owned solely by the risk function.
It is more often an ongoing, cross-functional activity, since signals arise across many domains and evolve continuously. Confining it to a single function or a fixed cadence can leave meaningful signals undetected.

Best practices

Establish a recurring horizon-scanning routine that draws on both internal indicators and external sources across technological, regulatory, geopolitical, and social domains, rather than relying on a single annual review.
Use qualitative and scenario-based methods to characterize emerging risks by plausibility, velocity, and interconnectedness where reliable likelihood and impact data are unavailable, and document the uncertainty explicitly.
Draw on diverse, cross-functional input, including risk, compliance, legal, and business perspectives, to reduce blind spots, since emerging risks frequently span multiple domains.
Define clear criteria and pathways for escalating emerging risks into governance and oversight structures so that novel threats reach appropriate decision-makers in a timely way.
Distinguish the act of identifying an emerging risk from assessing and treating it, and avoid assuming that identification alone modifies the risk or implies controls are in place.
Periodically revisit and reassess previously identified emerging risks, as their significance, data availability, and interconnections may change over time and some may migrate into the established risk register.
Application Security Isn’t Optional Anymore.